23 Mar 2017

Why we must stand with Bishop Williamson who was “excommunicated” by a manifest anti-pope


by Jonathan Ekene Ifeanyi

Bishop Williamson
Today we see a lot of evil-doers who parade themselves as “Catholics” but are—by their actions—clearly not. You will see these evil-doers chiefly among those who adamantly and fanatically adhere to the teachings of Novus Ordoism, among the Sedevacantists, and unfortunately, even among members of the SSPX, or rather, what is now rightly called the Neo-SSPX. I don’t need to say much about these peoples. I have encountered them several times and can simply describe them as “schismatic, fanatical, and haters of truth”. It doesn’t matter whether you meet them among Novus Ordites, or Sedevacantists, or the SSPX—they are just the same, ENEMIES OF TRUTH! When they come to you for discussion on Church matters you will certainly think they’ve come to learn sincerely—BUT NO. Just like heretics do, they’ve already “fashioned” their own “Catholicism” and that’s all they’re really interested to spread! Some people think the main problem in today’s Church is just the apostasy of Church leaders. But no—there are now powerful heretics even among the “lay faithful” as well.

Vatican II of course is the cause of all this. Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, who ordained four bishops in 1988including great Bishop Richard Williamsonto continue his good work of propagating the true Catholic Faith, is arguably the greatest opponent of the evil council. In an interview he granted in the 1970s we read the following:

Question:

You have debated and taken part in the deliberations of the second council of the Vatican, have you not?

Archbishop Lefebvre:

Yes.

Question:

Did you not sign and agree to the resolutions of this council?

Archbishop Lefebvre:

No. First of all, I have not signed all the documents of Vatican II because of the last two acts. The first, concerned with "Religion and Freedom," I have not signed. The other one, that of “The Church in the Modern World”, I also have not signed. This latter is in my opinion the most oriented toward modernism and liberalism.

Question:

Are you on record for not only not signing the documents but also on record to publicly oppose them?

Archbishop Lefebvre:

Yes. In a book, which I have published in France, I accuse the council of error on these resolutions, and I have given all the documents by which I attack the position of the council—principally, the two resolutions concerning the issues of religion and freedom and "The Church in the Modern World.”

Question:

Why were you against these decrees?

Archbishop Lefebvre:

Because these two resolutions are inspired by liberal ideology which former popes described to usthat is to say, a religious license as understood and promoted by the Freemasons, the humanists, the modernists and the liberals.

Question:

Why do you object to them?

Archbishop Lefebvre:

This ideology says that all the cultures are equal; all the religions are equal, that there is not a one and only true faith. All this leads to the abuse and perversion of freedom of thought. All these perversions of freedom, which were condemned throughout the centuries by all the popes, have now been accepted by the council of Vatican II. (See: Archbishop Lefebvre’s ordination not also Valid?).

Carefully note his emphasis onliberal ideology which former popes described to us—that is to say, a religious license as understood and promoted by the Freemasons, the humanists, the modernists and the liberals—the very same “liberation theology” which “Pope” Francis is promoting today and is being intentionally ignored by Bishop Fellay who claims to be Archbishop Lefebvre’s “successor”!

Precisely, Bishop Williamson stands to champion the stance of Archbishop Lefebvre and that’s why he has been persecuted both by anti-pope Francis and Bishop Fellay—and that’s why all true Catholics must stand with him. Standing with him doesn’t mean senselessly declaring all Novus Ordo priests “invalidly ordained” or stupidly saying that the Church no longer exists except what we see in Sedevacantism! Rather, it means standing with the Catholic Church—standing with Truth, standing with Justice.  
Indeed, Francis-church, as many observers say, has become almost like a club, where sodomite “priests” run rampant and advance the most demonic homosexual agenda. Francis has commended Islam, prayed at the Blue Mosque in Turkey (the nation of the Antichrist), and kissed the hand of Michele de Paolis, one of the most notorious homosexual activists in Italy, and so on! Was it surprising then, that the same “pope” Francis—who has been praised and honoured by Freemasons even openly—“excommunicated” Bishop Williamson who, like Lefebvre, is an outspoken critique of the modernist agenda that has infiltrated the Church? Just like Lefebvre who defied John Paul II of unfortunate memory and went ahead to consecrate four bishops (and was falsely “excommunicated” by the same John Paul II), so Williamson, in 2015, after having been persecuted by Bishop Fellay, and even "expelled" in 2012, defied him and the anti-pope (Francis) by ordaining Fr Jean-Michel Faure, 73, a bishop without "papal approval" during a ceremony in Nova Friburgo, Brazil, on the feast of St Joseph.

Modernist Vatican “excommunicated” him, yet they are not excommunicating the multitude of corrupt and evil bishops and priests who are running rampant throughout the Church! For example, Robert L. Kincl is a canon law judge for the Vatican who was appointed by modernist Rome. He teaches that it’s okay for two men to masturbate each other, and not only this—he also defended a convicted child molester, Robert Hrdlicka. Even Novus Ordite Theodore Shoebat protested against this, in his 2015 article "Pope Francis Excommunicates Conservative Bishop, While He Tolerates Evil Priests Who Advance The Homosexual Agenda":

“I confronted Deacon Ron Walker, an official of the Vatican, asking why the Church has done nothing to punish Robert L. Kincl, a priest and canon law judge who was appointed by the Pope himself, who teaches that if two men masturbate each other they do not commit sin, and who himself defended confirmed child molester priest, Fr. Robert Hrdlicka. This is after Shoebat.com filed a complaint against Kincl after we caught him teaching us depravity.

“Deacon Ron Walker and the Bishop of Austin, Joe Vasquez, and Vicar General Daniel Garcia, did nothing to have Robert L. Kincl punished, even after they promised to take care of this evil. Why Pope Francis excommunicated Bishop Williamson, why doesn’t he also excommunicate Robert L. Kincl?

“Not only this, but we also have Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, a priest who forced himself on a young man named Hector Escelante and kissed him on the lips. Yarbrough is also a major donor to a homosexual activist group. Why hasn’t the Pope excommunicated this deviant?

“While we were doing some work in Texas we were told of a man named Msgr. Michael Yarbrough (also known as Michael Yarborough), and how he is a deviant priest who forcefully kissed a young man named Hector Escalante on the lips, and how he was supporting a pro homosexual group called Call to Action. Here is a photo of Msgr. Michael Yarbrough:

Msgr. Michael Yarbrough
“Well, we decided that we were going to bait Msgr. Michael Yarbrough. I visited him in a confessional booth where I told him my age and apparently it registered an interest and he asked me if I wanted to come and hang out with him. He fell for the bait. I found it very odd that a priest of his high position, with a very busy schedule, would all of a sudden want to spend time with me.

“I accepted his offer, and gave him a call, and asked him if we would meet at a book store. He said that he preferred that we meet in his office.

“When I did research on Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, I found a 2002 report written in the San Antonio Express which stated:

“Hector Escalante complained that Monsignor Michael Yarbrough kissed him on the lips and groped him in his office in 1998 when Escalante was 27, on his last day on the job as a St. Matthew’s Parish employee.

“Yarbrough admitted kissing him but said Escalante misunderstood the gesture, which the priest said was common among men in his family. He denied groping Escalante.

“Imagine, a man kissing another man on the lips as “common.”

“I told Msgr. Michael Yarbrough that it would be better that we meet in a book store, to which he agreed. I asked him how much time he had, and he said, as long as I wanted. After doing some more research, I also found out that on top of kissing a young man on the lips, Msgr. Michael Yarbrough is also a major donor to a pro homosexual group, called Call to Action, and I found his name on a list made by Call to Action designated as “major donors”. I took a snapshot of the list with Msgr. Michael Yarbrough’s name...

“So, we had the meeting at the bookstore, and after some conversation, I busted him on his heresies and his scandals, and also paid a visit to his church where I was eventually kicked out by his followers (who probably know nothing on how evil this heretic is)...” And so on!

We must stand with the persecuted Bishop Williamson (even if we haven’t seen him or he hasn’t visited our country), and totally reject Bishop Fellay because he is betraying Archbishop Lefebvre by mingling with modernist Rome in the name of seeking for “approval”. I myself used to tolerate the SSPX under Bishop Fellay but it was just a matter of conscience—at a point when I could no longer bear—particularly after his meeting with the anti-pope in Casa Santa Marta on October 13 2016, the very day the anti-pope went to Sweden to honour arch-heretic and blasphemer Martin Luther—my conscience said to me, STOP, and I obeyed, then wrote the following:

“Well now is the time for all SSPX faithful to put aside their sentiments and understand that this was exactly how Vatican II revolution started--gradual compromising! As Bishop Williamson warned three years ago, in his Open Letter To Priests of The Society of St. Pius X, “Blind leaders are a punishment from God”; we have to be serious with our study of the Catholic Faith and we also have to monitor seriously the activities of those leading us and be ready to challenge them whenever they mess up (doing so doesn't in any way means we hate them), “otherwise” said Bishop Williamson to the priests, “you will lose your Society without realizing it, just as the mass of Catholics lost their Church with Vatican II, and did not realize it. Then having made the disaster clear in your own mind, you must tell the truth to your Society flock, namely the danger in which your Superiors are placing their faith and therewith their eternal salvation.” 
           
“YES, Bishop Williamson was right when he warned three years ago that Bishop Fellay's leadership is leading the SSPX "away from the direction set for it by Archbishop Lefebvre, and towards the ideas and ideals of the Second Vatican Council." ” (See: OPEN LETTER TO PRIESTS of the SOCIETY of ST PIUS X, by Bishop Williamson).

As one writer comments:

“Of course we know that Bishop Williamson was unjustly expelled from the personal issues and agenda of Bishop Fellay wanting to reconcile with modernist Rome. Bishop Williamson was in the way. Or rather, any thought of Archbishop Lefebvre was in the way which is why near 60-priests have been transferred, expelled, moved over, incarcerated like Bishop Tissier who is still held in house arrest in Chicago, and some priests tried in Menzingen’s kangaroo courts admonished with bizarre ‘punishments’ to be silent. Also to mention some books of Archbishop Lefebvre quotes are banned inside the neo-sspx and legal action taken against any entity who uses quotes of Archbishop Lefebvre that Menzingen does not want to shed light on their deceits. 

“When Bishop Williamson was expelled in Oct. 2012, he wrote his last letter to Bishop Fellay as an open letter for the world to see the hypocrisy of Menzingen, its scandals, and a Catholic Bishop’s admonishment to another Catholic Bishop. In the end of Bishop Williamson’s letter, he stated:

“In brief, your Excellency, you may now go ahead and exclude me, because the arguments above are not likely to persuade you, but the exclusion will be more apparent than real. I have been a member of the Archbishop’s Society ever since my perpetual engagement. I have been one of its priests for 36 years. I have been one of its bishops, like yourself, for nearly a quarter of a century. That is not all to be wiped out with one stroke of a pen. Member of the Archbishop’s Society I therefore remain, and I wait.” OPEN LETTER TO BISHOP FELLAY ON AN “EXCLUSION”, London, 19 October, 2012, Bishop Williamson. 
www.therecusant.com/bp-w-open-letter-to-bp-f"

(See the article: Is Bishop Williamson still a SSPX Priest and Bishop?).

In short, currently to be a member of the SSPX (as championed by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre) means to stand with Bishop Williamson—one of the greatest opponents of Vatican II Church. To follow Bishop Fellay is to do just the opposite! 
Post a Comment